We had a disappointing experience, but it’s important to share both positives and negatives so other couples can make informed decisions. I won’t list every issue, but will highlig...ht the most significant ones.
Our wedding was in October 2024. We communicated exclusively with Ethan, who was also our primary shooter. Kyle was the second shooter and handled most editing.
Positives: Ethan was responsive to our emails, and both he and Kyle captured some footage that we were happy with. We received our raw files as promised.
One major issue involved the father-daughter dance. In the first draft, half of it was one continuous wide shot, almost entirely from behind my dad, with me barely visible. When we asked about it, Ethan insisted that much of the close-up footage couldn’t be used because guests had bumped the camera. It turns out my brother recorded the full dance on his phone; his video and the raw files clearly showed that no one ever bumped the camera. The only movement came when Kyle picked it up to get a better angle. The upsetting part was that our guests were blamed for something they didn't do, and the final version repeated the same clip twice since there wasn’t enough usable footage.
We were given a link to our draft to add annotations requesting changes. Upon reviewing, we saw this internal comment Ethan left for Kyle:
"Since we've already wasted so much time with this Wedding, I figured I'd double-down on my standards for the client's sake, as a solid crash-course on what I believe and what I expect to see in all of our work.."
When addressed, Ethan said he could see it read as rude but his intent was “to highlight the positives of [his and Kyle’s] collective effort” and “teach [his] new COO (Kyle) about the importance of standards, showcase the snowball effect that occurs when they aren't met, and demonstrate the impact it has on the company.” He said he found our project valuable because of the teaching opportunity and growth it inspired.
Framing that comment positively felt undermining and dismissive. I can’t imagine how it could've been meant in any way other than how it sounded. It's nice that this was a valuable learning experience for them, but we hired them believing they had more experience and upheld the “industry standards” they advertised.
We also paid for a Well Wishes segment that was never filmed. Ethan said the oversight was due to a former team member we never even interacted with. Throughout the entire process, we only worked directly with Ethan. His proposed solution was to conduct Zoom interviews with “a handful” of guests afterward and create what he described as a “Surprise Tribute Film.” In his words, he explained that many clients “retrospectively find Well Wishes boring” and implied this alternative would be better (which made us question why it’s offered). The other option was to be refunded for the cost of Well Wishes, plus an extra $75. We opted for the latter.
Ultimately, we felt there was a pattern of disorganization, deflection, and presenting an impression of a polished business that didn't align with our experience. While Ethan apologized for how we felt, those apologies felt minimizing. After everything, we still spent over $4,000, which, in our opinion, should've come with a much higher level of professionalism.